saturday, i rode over the golden gate bridge, starting from home:
View home to golden gate and back in a larger map
i took my googlephone with me and kept it recording my route. it did an awesome job, but because i'm such a slow rider, my epic 5 hour ride drained the battery to less than 15%, having started my ride at 100% fresh from wall power. this leaves me worried that on a multiday camping tour, my phone will not be the tool to use for mapping.
which is a shame: because the google maps integration is killer. i got all the info i'd want from a bike computer (except cadence and maybe temperature) plus it was instantly uploaded to google maps so i could share it with you people. on top of all that, it was accurate, which is more than i can say for any gps log i've ever created with any other device.
now, for the ride: i'm not too familiar with san francisco. i didn't know what to expect on this route because i've never really ridden north beyond the top of sawyer camp trail. in hindsight, for the "out" part of the ride, next time i'll take sawyer camp -- it's a more gentle ascent to 35 than hopping on 35 right off, and more scenic, too.
the first thing that struck me about this ride was the eucalyptus. there sure was a lot of it, and it came on at about mile 20. i don't get much eucalyptus on my usual rides, and it was a nice change of scenery. and, of course, the fog -- which blanketed me for most of the ride, and kept me nice and temperate, leaving me set for a big surprise when i emerged from it around 2 or 3pm to find it nearly 90F on the happy part of the peninsula! ouch!
the ride to and over the bridge was easy, once i'd gotten past the uphill part of 35, which, if i recall correctly, ends northbound around milbrae. during one downhill section, i hit a bump and lost a water bottle -- had to walk back uphill to recover it. there was another bottle in the same spot, someone else had lost a bottle on the same pothole. i grabbed it and rode with it for a bit, hoping to find the owner. no luck.
it was nice to ride so near to my friend the pacific. after a time, the eucalyptus smell gave way to sea salt, and then, to rotting seals. the rotting seals were not so nice, but you can't just pick and choose which bits of maritime odor you get to enjoy. the sea provides, i abide.
the route that i'd found on the internet was odd looking on a map, but made perfect sense once i was on the road. the somewhat obscure street choices all had very nice bike lanes, not too many stops, and were reasonably flat, particularly compared to other choices. since i went off-route and winged it on my way back, i saw first-hand how different choices result in gnarly hills.
i was pleased to discover that not all of san francisco is a dirty ghetto. i suppose i'd been going to the wrong parts. not that it makes any difference -- i don't know anybody that lives in the really nice bits near wherever the heck i was. still, at no point during my ride was i fearful of being bikejacked. not that i ever am. and i've ridden through indio.
the bridge itself was fun, frustrating, and very possibly a checklist ride item. that is, now that i've ticked it on my checklist, i'll never do it again. it was confusing to find out how to actually get on the bridge. i ended up asking a german who had some trouble differentiating "over" from "under" -- not that i blame him. to go over the bridge, you have to go under it, down a path which is not visibly connected to the bridge. i'm sure it would have all been easy to figure out if it had not been -- of course -- absolutely clogged with people.
this did not surprise me one bit, i thoroughly expected hordes of people. in fact, it was not nearly as bad as i had expected. cyclists have their own lane on the bridge, and though it was clogged with newbies, tandems, and tourists who'd never before been on a bike, (most) everyone was orderly, polite, and easy to pass. there are lots of obstacles on the bridge, both architectural (support beams and such) and artificial (port-a-pottys?!?). many people get off their bike to take pictures. for the most part, it wasn't bad. but i wasn't able to maintain any constant speed, and because it was so busy i couldn't really look around lest i hit someone. once on the other side, i said, "hyep", turned around, and rode home. not much else to do there unless i was in the mood for some serious climbing. which i wasn't.
i was in shorts and a t-shirt. i was not cold. it was not exactly warm, but not nearly as cold and windy as i thought it might be.
the ride home was grueling. i've got the endurance to keep on trucking, but i was tired and the return trip had a whole lot of climbing. i'd like to think i was tired from my hillsdale ride on thursday, but maybe i'm just outta shape. in any case: total distance, about 62 miles, with about 3850 feet of ascent. that's a pretty healthy bit of climbing for me. i used the granny gear quite a bit on my return trip. next time, perhaps not so much.