i dont usually have much to say about politics, but here we go anyhow.
the system, at least here in california, worked. and taken from the context of the original intent of the republic of states that we live in, the entire system worked.
obama won the popular vote by a relatively small percentage, and won the electoral college by an enormous landslide.
i was thinking today (on my run, of course) that the reason folks these days don't care much for the electoral college is because most of the rest of the constitution of the US has been so trashed that it no longer makes sense. originally the EC served to prevent tyranny of populous states over small states. Now, though, we suffer from tyranny of a strongarm federal government over all the states, large and small. for this, we can thank an earlier senator from illinois.
whether one thinks a strong federal government is a good or bad thing, it is easy to see why the EC makes little sense in a system where the states have very little power. since the federal government has taken enormous powers from the people and the states to rule over each of us individually, it makes sense that each of us individually -- and not the states -- should elect the federal government. the EC makes more sense in the context of the original system.
speaking of the original system, it's playing out right now in my home state. prop 8 appears to have passed. the whole elect-democrats-externally-but-vote-republican-internally thing has always confused me about CA, but i'm not a very bright person so a lot of things confuse me. one thing that doesn't confuse me is that prop 8 passing, as odious as i find it to be, is a prime example of the system working as the framers intended.
unfortunately, times have changed dramatically since the times of the founders. whereas in 1847 if your state outlawed your way of life, you could always go out and settle some wilderness and continue with your life undisturbed. being a blacksmith or a teacher or a farmer in one place wasn't much different from being the same elsewhere.
but now travel between states is a lot different. the barriers are much larger, the economic realities are harsher, and there isn't any wilderness to default to if you decide city B isn't better than city A.
sure, if you're gay in CA and you want to be married, you could in theory move to hawaii or mass or some such place. but the opportunities you'd find aren't the same as the ones you'd have found in 1801. maybe that's actually good. good or bad, though, the loose republic of states, where if you didn't care for the conditions in one state, you could escape their tyranny to live in the frontier, no longer really exists.
i'm also a bit pissed to see that the price of meat is going to go up in CA, just when i got my grill. sigh. CA: where we care more about our chickens than our people.